Subject	I find G-tec numbers to be very valid...
Posted by	tobartend on December 19, 2002 at 1:52 PM
	This message has been viewed 49 times.
In Reply To	C'mon man! That's G-Tech's own site. And it's just posted by JRH(KY) on December 19, 2002 at 12:54 PM
Message	There is only a slightly higher margin of error. There is however a higher degree of posiblity for operator error. But the G-tec is defanatly a legitimate measuring device. I compared the G-tecs numbers with ones gotten at the track and they run hand and hand.
Follow Ups	I finally broke into the 4.5's. I ran a 4.53 0-60 last nite - Scotts94z32 11:11:10 12/19/02 What is your measurement system? (n/m) - JRH(KY) 11:42:48 12/19/02 LED and LCD G-Techs. Great accelerometer tools. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 11:46:26 12/19/02 Pfft, "measurement system"....Shirley you jest! ____ ;) (n/m) - Mal1ce 11:47:54 12/19/02 I do not jest. And my next question would be... - JRH(KY) 11:56:16 12/19/02 you want tests??? see the attached... - Scotts94z32 12:16:59 12/19/02 C'mon man! That's G-Tech's own site. And it's just - JRH(KY) 12:54:58 12/19/02 Ok. I can agree that if we ALL used a G-tech as a measuring - Scotts94z32 13:12:49 12/19/02 How do you recommend measuring then? (n/m) - hoss 13:28:24 12/19/02 short of a track or equipment mounted on the car (like the - Scotts94z32 13:40:54 12/19/02 http://www.racelogic.co.uk/vbox/index.html (n/m) - JRH(KY) 13:47:56 12/19/02 I find G-tec numbers to be very valid... - tobartend 13:52:34 12/19/02 You proved my point. You backed up your G-Tech numbers with - JRH(KY) 14:03:41 12/19/02 my best times were within 1/10 second - Janders 20:53:14 12/19/02 the butt-o-meter! How quick does your butt feel at 60? 4sec? (n/m) - Smurf Z 13:56:42 12/19/02 I would have someone with a stop watch measure as well (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 11:58:05 12/19/02 Yeah that's accurate to AT LEAST 2 seconds plus/minus. (n/m) - JRH(KY) 12:07:41 12/19/02 Nice work. I need to get me one of those. (n/m) - BigTDogg (Z-Less till Spring) 12:22:32 12/19/02 tested a G-Tech and it's mph for 1/4 was optimistic - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 14:09:28 12/19/02 You know WHY that is, right? The track takes an average of - Z-Jay (Stored for WINTER!) 17:21:49 12/19/02 Let me suggest some improvements to the experiment.... - RSR 14:58:24 12/19/02 I have a hard time believing that last statement :) (n/m) - JRH(KY) 15:05:13 12/19/02 Hehe (n/m) - RSR 15:19:10 12/19/02 I do, and I plan on it. See you at the track. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 15:55:07 12/19/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.